ships are fictional and do not affect reality in any way

thesovereignempress:

tamhonks:

tenaflyviper:

badstevenuniversescreencaps:

tenaflyviper:

theswedishelf:

badstevenuniversescreencaps:

theswedishelf:

:

bad ask

They’re not wrong though.

shut the fuck up you know damn well this ask is about normalizing pedophilia with pedophilic ships and content

That doesn’t mean much, considering people will call ships involving adult characters or characters over the age of consent “pedophilic”.

If teenagers shipping fictional characters on a social media platform “normalizes pedophilia”, how come horror films released to thousands of theaters and seen by millions of patrons aren’t “normalizing” murder?  Aside from acts of terrorism, murder rates have only plummeted dramatically over the past few decades (which is backed by statistics from the Federal Bureau of Justice).

Oh, right. Because most sane people can tell the difference between fiction and reality, and realize that one doesn’t significantly affect the other.

Also, people like badstevenuniversescreencaps literally abuse and lower the value of the term of “pedophilia” for the purpose of glorified shipping wars, so their input is worth about as much as a pile of horse shit.

http://www.criminaljusticedegreesguide.com/features/8-horror-movies-that-inspired-real-life-crimes.html

wow look at that a list of murders inspired by horror movies

Oh, you poor thing.  Now you just brought hell upon yourself.  For one, that’s not a “study”.  That’s just a list of people who imitated something–people that were already fucked up to begin with, and would have likely imitated any act of violence from any source.  I’m literally just gonna copy-paste a previous post, because I detest repeating myself:

Here’s the problem with your statement: Being inspired by something does not equate to causing something.  You’re using the “Slippery Slope” logical fallacy
(which, ironically, is a favorite amongst overzealous fundamentalist
conservatives).  By your logic, you’re placing the blame for an incident
of a child jumping off the roof in the 90′s on Wile E. Coyote, and not on the child being improperly educated about neighborhood dangers, and being without parental supervision.

Bear
with me here, folks:  I’ve become increasingly tired of seeing the
argument that “FICTION IS REALITY!”, and I think it’s time to stomp some
sense into it.  It was bullshit when they tried to use the same argument against video games in the 90′s, it was bullshit when they tried to use it against horror movies and heavy metal music in the 80′s, and it’s bullshit now.

Let’s talk about the criminal mind for a moment.  It has been shown time and time again that criminals and abusers have a lack of function in the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for controlling our impulses, connecting our actions to their consequences, and having empathy for others.
Now, there are those out there with low functioning in these areas that
never harm a fly.  Why?  Because there are more ingredients required to
create an abuser.  How?  Not by “problematic” works of fiction:  They are primarily a result of broken homes, traumatic experiences, and–most importantly–parental abuse/neglect.  
Parental influence (or lack thereof) has been directly linked to lack of function in the brain, and behavioral issues, meaning that their time in the crib had a far greater influence on them than anything they will ever read, see, or hear.  When
nature and nurture have come together to create a psychopath, they have
molded an individual that is disconnected from reality in a very
dangerous way
.  It takes many factors working together to create
people capable of committing abuse.  No amount of fiction changes a
person’s upbringing, genetics, or brain function.  These are not average
people.  They are a very, very small minority of people that are fully,
completely aware that their behavior is wrong–they simply lack the inhibition to not go out and do it, and the empathy to care.  They would be this way regardless of the media they consumed, and removing them from it would change nothing, except potentially causing them to actively seek out the real thing, which–unlike fictional media–causes real, physical harm.

For your homework:

TL;DR: Not everyone who reads fiction even has the ability
to act out in ways they know are morally wrong: A well-adjusted person
(including most with lower-functioning empathy) knows and understands
the consequences for such behavior.  They are still able to connect
their actions to how they may affect others, which–in turn–keeps those
actions in check.  The people that do act out inappropriately are already broken, and would act out regardless
of whatever they see or hear (especially if they are already into or
past adolescence, as the majority of brain growth takes place from
infancy to early preschool).

Essentially, the people that might act out in violence would do so regardless of media input.  Telling them “This is WRONG!” wouldn’t stop them, because they’re already aware that it’s wrong and simply do not fucking care.

Even an actual horror movie had the self-awareness to point this out.

image

In short: You’re ignorant and uneducated in this matter, and you have nothing to substantiate your claims, while there is a shit ton of scientific and psychological study proving you wrong.

they deleted that shit so fast 

I love posts like this. Writers, shippers – write and ship what you want to.