thegeekyblonde:

delladilly:

riddlemetom:

newdisaster:

pretentiousteatime:

do you guys ever wonder why the students at hogwarts are afraid of the shrieking shack because its “haunted” when they literally go to school with ghosts

….wait

they even went to a freaking deathday party

YOU GUYS the shrieking shack is scary not because it’s haunted but because it’s said to be haunted by an especially violent ghost who throws shit and screams and could hurt you, not like the chill ghosts at hogwarts who just talk about their feelings and their clique problems

ELLIE WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS POST OF YOURS

The Weeping Angels have gone from an incredibly creepy one-off villain into creatures that, like the Daleks before them, have lost any ability to inspire fear. They are only terrifying if they obey the rules that make them feel real … and these angels never do. They attack you in an instant if you blink, but Rory and Amy can look away from them for a good minute to debate how to defeat them without any dire consequences. They zap you back in time if they touch you, unless you’re River Song, in which case they just grab hold of your wrist and don’t let go. They always cover their eyes to protect themselves from being quantum locked, except when they don’t. They turn to stone when observed, but can cross a huge, vibrant city full of people with no problems. They only send people back in time when they are weak, otherwise they just kill them (a la Season 5), but when they’re superpowerful in New York, they stick to the back-in-time plan. And it’s lucky that there are no pictures of New York City landmarks, since an image of an angel is an angel and all.

An interesting criticism of The Weeping Angels by FeministFiction, The Angels Take Manhattan Review (via neighborly)